Skip to main content

The importance of seeking knowledge

The following is a transcript of a talk delivered on this subject:

The Prophet (saw) said: "Seeking knowledge is an obligation upon every Muslim"

Today unfortunately we see many Muslims who when it comes to their education, work or even entertainment they would gain a lot of knowledge regarding these areas, however when it comes to the Deen they have very little. Indeed the Prophet (saw) mentioned this time:

Hazzam bin Hakeem narrated from his uncle from the Messenger of Allah (SAW) who said: “You are in a time of many jurisprudents (fuqaha), few speakers, many who give and few who ask; so action in this time is better than knowledge. There will soon come a time of few jurisprudents, many speakers, many who beg and few who give; so knowledge in this time is better than action.”

What type of knowledge is Fard ul Ayn?

Firstly, It is obligatory upon us all to believe in Islam definitively without a doubt and therefore this knowledge must be known to us. This is the knowledge of the fundamentals of Aqeeda

He (swt) says: “And verily guess is no substitute for the truth.” [TMQ 53:28]

And He (swt) said: “They have no (certain) knowledge. They follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not (‘Isa).” [TMQ 4:157]

"Do you have Ilm for that which you claim so that you provide us with? You follow nothing but conjecture (Zann)." [TMQ 6:148]

"These are nothing but names which you have devised, you and your fathers, for which Allah has sent down no authority. They follow nothing but conjecture and what their Nafs desire. Even though there has already come to them the Guidance from their Rabb" [TMQ 53:23]

Jalaluddin as-Suyuti, a Mujtahid Imam of the Shafi madhab has commented on this verse, that the people had zann (conjecture) which is opposed to knowledge (ilm) i.e. certain knowledge. He also stated that Allah had sent down definitive proof (Burhan Qati) for the truth of the Islamic Aqeeda. [Tafseer al Jalalayn page 627. It is stated in Reliance of the Traveller Ahmed ibn Naqib al misri (ra) (769/1368) Book of Qada (Judiciary)]
In all of these and other ayaat (verses) to do with beliefs Allah (swt) censures those who take the beliefs through conjecture (Zann) and decisively prohibits them from this.

Therefore it is prohibited for us to have emotional belief or belief based on imitation. We must know for ourselves that Allah (swt) exists, that Muhammad (saw) is His last Messenger, the Quran is the word of Allah and whatever is contained in it is the truth such as the belief in the angels, previous books, previous prophets, the day of Judgment, Jannah, Jahannam, etc.

Secondly, it is an individual obligation for us to know the Shariah rules related to our own lives and actions.

Allah (swt) has addressed us directly in the Quran on so many occasions:

“O you who believe, obey Allah and His Messenger”

We know that our purpose in life is to worship Allah (swt) as Allah said:

“I have not created Jinn or mankind except that they worship me” [TMQ 51:57]

Allah (swt) has also clearly ordered us to take from the Messenger (saw):

“And whatsoever the Messenger (Muhammad [saw]) gives you, take it, and whatsoever he forbids you, abstain (from it).” [TMQ59:7]

Therefore we must at least know the Shariah rules relating the Fara’id (obligations) and Muharramat (prohibitions) from our actions such as:
- The ahkam (rules) of Salah
- The ahkam of relationships with the opposite sex
- The ahkam of responsibility to parents
- The ahkam of buying
- The ahkam of replying the to the Salam
- The ahkam of backbiting
- The ahkam of working for Khilafah
- The ahkam of Riba (usury)

Whatever actions we undertake we need to know the hukm before performing the action, there is a principle in Usul: Every actions requires a hukm and every hukm requires an evidence

Therefore it is Fard for a doctor to know the ahkam relating to his field, e.g. is post-mortem allowed, rules relating to treating the opposite sex, using intoxicants for medical purposes, etc.

For an Imam of the Masjid it is Fard to know the ahkam relating to leading the prayer, the obligations of the Khutba, the responsibility towards the Muslims, the obligations of speaking the truth from the Minbar, etc.

It is Fard for the teacher to know whether it is permitted to teach subjects that contradict Islam and promote Kufr, the ahkam of teaching members of the opposite sex, the ahkam of disciplining the student.

It is Fard for the husband to know his obligations towards his wife, what are the prohibited actions to undertake with her, how can he discipline her if she is disobedient, etc. Similarly for the wife to know her responsibilities towards her husband, parent towards the child, child towards the parents and so on.

It is Fard for the Khalifah of the Muslims to know ahkam relating to his responsibility, etc.

We must ensure that we follow the Shariah and not rules invented from the mind

In the Hadith in Sahih of Bukhari, on the authority of 'Urwa b. al-Zubayr who said: 'Abd Allah b. 'Amr b. al-'As overcame us with proof. I heard him say: “Allah will not deprive you of knowledge after he has given it to you, but it will be taken away through the death of the learned men (Ulema’a) with their knowledge. There will remain ignorant people who, when consulted, will give verdicts according to their opinions whereby they will mislead others and themselves go astray.” i.e. they give Fatwas according to their own opinions which are not derived from the Islamic evidences.

In the authentic Hadith the Prophet (saw) said: “The best speech is the Book of Allah and the best guidance is the guidance of Muhammad (saw). And the evil matters are the newly invented issues and every Bida’a (innovation) is a misguidance.” The 'newly invented issues' are the Bida’a (innovations), they are whatever contradicts the Islamic evidences.

Hadith narrated by Al-Daraqtuni in Al-Afrad, of Anas of the Prophet (saw), where he said: "Whomever cheats my Ummah has the curse of Allah, the Angels and the people combined, upon him. They asked: What is cheating, Oh Prophet of Allah? He said: If he invented an innovation for them, and they acted upon it".

“Whoever speaks about the Quran without any knowledge, then let him seek his place in the fire of hell.” [Tirmidhi , Abu Dawud]

Islam has forbidden us from following any path other than the path of ‘Ilm: “And follow not that of which you have no knowledge. Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah).” [TMQ 17:36]

Even if we are not aware of the evidence, we must know that the hukm is derived from the Islamic texts by legitimate Ijtihad

“So ask the people of the Reminder (ahl al-zikr) if you do not know.” [TMQ 21:7]

He (swt) has ordered the one who does not have the knowledge to ask the one who is more knowledgeable than him.

It has also been narrated on the authority of Jabir (ra): “a man was struck by a stone that fractured his skull. Then he had a wet dream. He asked his companions - do you know of a permit (Rukhsa) for me to perform Tayammum (dry ablution)? - They said - we do not find any permit for you and you can use water. He then had a bath and died. The Prophet (saw) said: “Verily, it would have sufficed for him to make Tayammum, so tie a piece of cloth around his head and wipe over it and wash the rest of his body.' And the Prophet (saw) said: 'why did they not ask when they did not know. Indeed, the cure for inability and lack of knowledge is to ask.” [Abu Dawud: 275, Ibn Majah: 565, Ahmad: 2898] The Messenger (saw) instructed them to ask about the Hukm Shar'ai.

We have to be careful from whom we take our knowledge in relation to the Shariah rules, they should be someone we trust and someone who basis their opinions upon the Islamic evidences.

A narration of Imam Zuhri springs to mind, "Be careful from whom you take your knowledge, because that is your Deen."

We should beware of all government Mufti’s, scholars and Imams – also those who have openly violated the Shariah or given verdicts that contradict the Qati (definitive) matters.

Abu Hanifah said, “If you see the scholar at the gates of the ruler then accuse him in his Deen”.

True scholars never compromise the truth. Let us take the example of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (rahimallah), the master of Hadeeth, the Mujtahid of Makkah and to whom the Hanbali Madhab is attributed. In his time Ma’moon became Khaleefah who had adopted the Mu’tazilla belief that the Quran was created and attempted to force this belief upon the masses.

He started with the Ulema as they were the ones who had the leadership over the Ummah. Amongst the Ulema was Imam Ahmad who refused to accept this corrupt doctrine. His uncle went to him and asked him to say with his tongue what he does not accept in his heart, to this he responded, “If the Alim stays silent in the face of falsehood when will the truth become manifest”.

The recommended knowledge

Gaining knowledge in the other areas of Islam which is beyond the knowledge of the fundamentals of Aqeeda and direct ahkam for our lives is mandub (recommended. Such as knowing the evidences for the ahkam, knowledge of the Seerah, Islamic history (Tarikh), Tafseer, Arabic language, Ilm al-Hadith and Usul ul-Fiqh.

We should strive to achieve this knowledge continuously

The rewards of gaining knowledge

Al-Bukhari narrated through Mu’awiyya bin Abu Sufyan: The Messenger of Allah (SAW) said:
“The one for whom Allah wills good (khayr), He grants him fiqh in the deen.”

It was narrated that Umar bin al-Khattab said: “The death of one thousand worshippers who pray at night and worship in the day is less serious than the death of one intelligent knower (baseer) of the halal and haram of Allah.”

All these narrations indicate to us as Muslims, and emphasise the importance of seeking knowledge.

Abu Huraira said, The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: "The word of wisdom is the lost property of the believer, so wherever he finds it he has a better right to it." (Tirmidhi).

Abu Dardaa' (ra) said: "To learn of one issue (in deen) is better for me than to pray the entire night"

He also said: "The scholar and the seeker of knowledge are the partners in the sharing of good. Other men are hungry and there is no good in them."

Fath Al Musilee (radhiallahu anhu) said: "Would the sick person who is not fed or given anything to drink or given any medicine, not die?" The people replied: "Surely!" He said: "It is the same with the heart, it would die if knowledge and wisdom is withheld from it."

Narrated Abdullah bin Masud (Allah be pleased with him): The Prophet (peace be upon him) said, "Do not wish to be like anyone except in two cases. (1) (The first is) A person, whom Allah has given wealth and he spends it righteously; (2) (the second is) the one whom Allah has given wisdom and he acts according to it and teaches it to others." (Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol 1).

Abu Huraira said, The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: "People are like mines of silver and gold; the more excellent of them in the days of Ignorance are the more excellent of them in Islam when they attain knowledge.” (Muslim, Mishkat).

Status of people of knowledge

The people of knowledge have a special status in Islam, we should respect them

“Say: "Are those who know equal to those who know not?" It is only men of understanding who will remember.” [TMQ az-Zumar:9]

Jabir (ra) reported: After the battle of Uhud, the Prophet (saw) arranged the burial of two of the martyrs in one grave. In each case he would ask, “Which one of them had learnt more Qur'an by heart?” He placed whichever was thus pointed out to him, first in the Lahd (type of grave). [Bukhari]

'Ubaadah b. as-Saamit (ra) narrated that the Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “He is not from my Ummah who does not acknowledge the honour due to our elders, who shows no mercy to our younger ones and nor recognises the right of our scholar.” Al-Munziri said: reported by Ahmad with a hasan chain. Al-Haythami said: reported by Ahmad and at-Tabaraani and its isnad is hasan.

Abdullah b. al-Mas'ud (ra) narrated that the Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “Let those be nearest to me in Salah (prayer) who are mature and possess (religious) knowledge, then those who are nearest to them in these respects.” He repeated this three times and then added, “Beware of indulging in the loose talks of the markets (when you are in the mosque).” [Muslim]

Abu Musa (ra) narrated that the Messenger of Allah (saw) said: “It is out of reverence to Allah that we respecting an aged Muslim, and the one who commits the Qur'an to memory and does not exaggerate pronouncing its letters and nor forgets it after memorising, and to respect the just ruler.” Reported by Abu Dawud. An-Nawawi said the hadith is hasan. Ibn Muflih said the isnad is jayyid.

May Allah (swt) enable us to gain the correct knowledge and apply it.

Abu Ismael

Comments

momo said…
Salaamoe alaikoum

Does learn by hard (in the article heart is been written) means only to learn it by hard without practising upon it?

see text: Jabir (ra) reported: After the battle of Uhud, the Prophet (saw) arranged the burial of two of the martyrs in one grave. In each case he would ask, “Which one of them had learnt more Qur'an by heart? He placed whichever was thus pointed out to him, first in the Lahd (type of grave). [Bukhari]
Islamic Revival said…
learn by heart is the correct english expression, some people mispronounce it and say learnt by hard but the correct way to say it is learnt by heart which means to memorise it.
momo said…
Salaamoe alaikoum wr wb

Many thanks for your quick answer. Concerning the other part of my question: does memorising means "put into action"?? Or do we have to assume that these sahabat did practice what they know of Qur'an.
Anonymous said…
salaam,

When the companions were learning to memorise the Qur'an, they would be given 10 ayats at a time, which they would:
firstly have to memorise by heart, secondly understand their complete meaning beyond just the literal translation and
finally, they would show that they could implement that understanding in their lives.

Only after this would they be allowed to move onto the next 10 ayats.

A reminder for us all on the search for knowledge
Anonymous said…
Sorry, small addendum

You wrote "Let us take the example of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (rahimallah), the master of Hadeeth, the Mujtahid of Makkah and to whom the Hanbali Madhab is attributed. "

My understanding was that Ahmed ibn Hanbal was from Baghdad, not from Makkah, Allah u Alim.
Anonymous said…
Asa

I have a question on the role of scholars.

When I discuss with some brothers in the community, they tend to minimize the role of scholars in the deen. They argue we don't need scholars for the Qati issues and we only need them for the Zanni issues. So, they say that when Allah swt says in the Qu'ran that Salaah is fardh, we don't need scholars to explain us that salah is fardh or that when Allah swt says in the Qu'ran 'Fighting has been prescribed for you though you dislike it ...', we don't need scholars to tell us that fighting jihaad is fardh. So, when a scholar in Saudi says that there is no Jihaad, they say we don't need that scholar opinion because the ayaahs and hadiths are very clear on that matter. It goes back to their mantra of "following Qu'ran Sunnah".

So, my question is do we need scholars to explain us the Qati issues if these issues are in origin Qati and that there can be no difference of opinions on these issues. In other words, how does (or can) the average Muslim man know that praying 5 times is fardh, that Jihaad is fardh or that ruling by what Allah swt has revealed is fardh? Does the average Muslim man know about these by simply refering himself directly to the texts without any scholarly guidance or is it the ijma of the scholars that help him having conviction that these issues are indeed Qati? In other words, do scholars play any roles with regard to the Qati issues? And linked to that, how do we, the average Muslims, know which issues (precisely, which ayaah and hadiths) are Qati and (thusby) which ones are not Qaati?

sorry for the long question

ms
Islamic Revival said…
Imam Ahmad was born in Khorasaan and died in Baghdad. However during his life he travelled to many cities including Makkah.

Imaam Ahmad (ra) said: " I traveled in the search of knowledge and hadith to: Shaam, Morocco, Aljazaair, Makkah, Madinah, Yemen, 'Iraaq, Persia and Khurasaan and then returned to Baghdaad. And when I went to Kufah, I was once at a stage when I only had a brick as my pillow"!
Islamic Revival said…
Jazakallah khair for your question

There are 2 types of Qati matters in Islam, one is those that is by definitive text (Qati ut-thuboot) in tranmission and which are definite in meaning (Qati ud-dalalah) such as the obligation of salah or the prohibition of ruling by other than what Allah has revealed - to deny this type is kufr.

The other type is when the text is authentically transmitted but not definitively transmitted i.e. it is sahih and not mutawatir, it is definitive in meaning and there is no other conflicting texts on the issue such the prohibition of women being rulers which is from a clear hadith in sahih muslim. To deny this rule is fisq (transgression.

Now regarding how the layman can tell the matters which are definitive in the deen. In origin it is to do with the text itself. Such as the verse which says:
'Allah is one', it is clear that He cannot be more than one.

A text which is definitive text in meaning is one which is clear and specific; it has only one meaning and admits of no other interpretations. An example of this is the text on the entitlement of the husband in the estate of his deceased wife, as follows: “In what your wives leave, your share is a half, if they leave no child" [TMQ al-Nisa', 4:12]. Other examples are:

“The adulterer, whether a man or a woman, flog them each a hundred stripes” [TMQ al-Baqarah, 2:196]

“Those who accuse chaste women of adultery and fail to bring four witnesses [to prove it], flog them eighty stripes” [TMQ al-Nur, 24:4]

The quantitative aspects of these rulings, namely one half, one hundred, and eighty are self-evident and therefore not open to interpretation.

For the layman there is an easy way to check whether the matter is definitive or not he can refer to whether the issue was accepted as a subject of legitimate ikhtilaf (difference) of opinion or not, if it was not such as the obligation of the Muslim woman to wear the khimar (headscarf), the obligation to cut the hand of the thief and kill the male apostate - then he can know that it is clear. So if today anyone doubts these matters or says something against them then he should not accept that at all and should refer back to the authentic evidences to refute them.
Islamic Revival said…
It is the text itself that proves something is definite, one needs to refer to the texts and for the ignorant looking at if the matter was disputed or not by the scholars in history helps him detect those issues so he can then scrutinise the texts.
Anonymous said…
Asakwrwb!
Could your pleas provide the reference of the following:


Hazzam bin Hakeem narrated from his uncle from the Messenger of Allah (SAW) who said: “You are in a time of many jurisprudents (fuqaha), few speakers, many who give and few who ask; so action in this time is better than knowledge. There will soon come a time of few jurisprudents, many speakers, many who beg and few who give; so knowledge in this time is better than action.”

Where it has been taken from?
Islamic Revival said…
It is reported by tabarani in his Alkabeer. The Arabic of the hadith is:

وعن حزام بن حكيم بن حزام عن أبيه عن النبي قال: «إنكم قد أصبحتم في زمان كثير فقهاؤه قليل خطباؤه كثير معطوه قليل سؤاله العمل فيه خير من العلم وسيأتي زمان قليل فقهاؤه كثير خطباؤه وكثير سؤاله قليل معطوه العلم فيه خير من العمل»
Anonymous said…
salam alikum ,
does islam also obligates seeking the knowledge of science and technology like computer science , physics , chemistry ?
does Prophet s.a.w categorized the knowledge as knowlwdge of islam and knowledge of science ? plz give a detail answer
abul khayr said…
It was narrated that Umar bin al-Khattab said: ‘The death of one thousand worshippers who pray at night and worship in the day is less serious than the death of one intelligent knower (baseer) of the halal and haram of Allah.’
abul khayr said…
Asak Please Provide the Reference for this narration.Jzk!

It was narrated that Umar bin al-Khattab said: ‘The death of one thousand worshippers who pray at night and worship in the day is less serious than the death of one intelligent knower (baseer) of the halal and haram of Allah.’
Ziaur Rahman said…
Assalam U alaikum Brother I translated this article in Hindi language if it could use by any means so kindly send the contact mail id so that i can mail that to you , it may be hindi reader also get benefited from it .
Anonymous said…
Umar Ibn Al-Khattab (Radiallahu anhu) said: “The death of a thousand worshipers is easier to bear than the death of a scholar who has knowledge of what Allah has permitted and forbidden.”
Miftah Dar as-Sa’adah, 1/122; Fara’id al-Kalam, p. 157.
bilal said…
Very beautifully described the important of seeking knowledge. Keep spreading some kind of this post for everyone who don't know what is important of knowledge of Islam.

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran