Skip to main content

America fears the fall of its puppet Bashar al-Assad so hints at military intervention to prevent the rise of Islam


بِسْمِ اللّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ
America is afraid of the collapse of its puppet, Bashar, at the hands of Muslims before the emergence of their alternative, so it revives the Yemeni solution and hints at military intervention, imagining it would prevent the return of Islam rising to power again!
In a notable statement on 28th May 2012, the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs Gen. Martin Dempsey said: "the Pentagon is ready for the option of military intervention to end the violence in Syria". This sudden statement comes after a series of statements from U.S. Defense Secretary Panetta, and Secretary of State Clinton, and from the head of the US Government, Obama that ruled out military intervention in Syria because it would complicate matters. The last of these statements came in the meeting of the G8 and the meeting of NATO countries. The general line of U.S. policy in Syria was to make room for its puppet Bashar to kill and suppress until it prepared a substitute regime that would preserve its on-going influence in Syria. It did this by calling for a peaceful political transition of governance, negotiation, and giving successive deadlines until such time as it finishes manufacturing its substitute agent as alternative. The previous initiatives, Arab observers, then the international observers came in this context. The last of these was Annan's initiative that came to serve the general stance of American policy. This is what Annan himself announced, when he called the government and the opposition to sit at the negotiating table; and said that his mission was to find a solution to the conflict in Syria, which could start with a political process.
This initiative of Annan is an American initiative par excellence. His visit came immediately after the Houla massacre and in the atmosphere of accelerated severance of diplomatic relations with the Syrian regime, carrying a message to the Syrian people that it cannot be saved from the Syrian regime except through the American solution! This is the way by which America propagates its plan: a criminal regime that exercises the horrible crimes against unarmed civilians; and the initiative led by Annan, who has mastered the art of covering up crimes against humanity! His precedent in Bosnia bears witness to that. Our memories still retain images of the huge massacres in Bosnia when the West left its Muslims to be slaughtered and killed, where 8,000 men and children of the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica were killed, at a time when Annan himself was responsible for the peace-keeping operations at the United Nations. But when they felt that the balance has tilted in favor of Muslims, they intervened and imposed their unjust solutions.
Similarly, as the tone of America changed to military intervention in Bosnia when the balance tipped in favor of the Muslims, so it wanted to break their power and forced them to accept their solution. America has sensed the balance is tilting in favour of the brave rebels, and that its puppet Bashar is shaking, no longer able to hold out until the alternative is ready. Its tone has shifted from giving deadlines to Bashar to trying to change the regime from within by Bashar's departure and inaugurating his deputy after him, as called for by Qatar. This follows the Yemeni process, which was rejected at the time by America and its followers in the Syrian regime, because it was led by the British. It has now returned to it, where Obama, together with the leaders of the G8, stressed the need for Assad's departure. He pointed to Yemen as a model for a political transition that could succeed in Syria. In this regard, U.S. National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon also stated that Obama raised the issue of the peaceful transition plan on the Yemeni model with the Prime Minister of Russia, Medvedev, on the sidelines of the G8 summit at Camp David. He added that this plan would be on the table for talks between Obama and Putin at the first meeting bringing them together.
America is aware that the rebels in Syria did not rise up to change one agent for another; nor to switch an ugly face for another, and that Bashar, his deputy, and his deputy's deputy and all his cronies are all the same in the crime, cruelty and betrayal. The rebels will not settle for other than the uprooting of the regime, and the establishment of the rule of Islam: the rightly-guided Khilafah in Sham, the centre of the abode of Islam. Therefore, America has resorted to threats of military intervention, which came in the announcement of the U.S. Army Chief of Staff, Martin Dempsey. This is an indication of its readiness for the option of military intervention in the event of a threat to its influence in Syria. It does not intend to intervene to change the Syrian regime as some people think! The timing of this statement gives a clear signal that the Syrian situation has reached a crisis point that threatens American influence. It demonstrates also that the regime of Bashar is unsustainable until such time as an alternative becomes ready. So America's hinting at military intervention is to scare the rebels in order that they do not establish the rule of Islam in Syria, where America would then retreat to its own backyard for good.
O Muslims: The internal situation of the Syrian regime is no longer merely shaken. Its pillars are about to collapse. The balance has begun to tilt in favour of the blessed revolution, manifested in specific operations, in addition to the legendary ideological steadfastness of the people and their determination to overthrow the regime. Furthermore, the strike in Damascus indicates that the power of Bashar no longer extends beyond his palace and the security headquarters and barracks. The famous Hamidiyya market was closed followed by its twin: the market of Hareekah, and Al-Asrooniyyah; and the historic market of Medhat Pasha, and Khalid Bin Al Waleed street and others. The strike at the heart of Damascus was a serious blow to a regime whose poisoned stomach is still hurting.
O Muslims rising in Sham, of victory and triumph, Allah willing:
The guide does not lie to his people, and Hizb ut-Tahrir warns you of the West and its moves, especially at this critical moment. So, declare your rejection of all of its initiatives, and discard the opposition that begs for the poisoned Western solutions, some of which call for the coming of Ash-Shar'a after Assad for example, as Abed Rabbo came after Ali Saleh, in the Yemeni model which Obama presented to Putin. You must consider each contact with the West and begging solutions from it as an unforgivable treason. Do not let the threats of the U.S. Chief of Staff with military intervention frighten you. For as long as you remain honest with Allah and His Messenger, America and its masses will, Inshallah, be defeated. You and your loyal soldiers, with the rally of the Ummah around you, will be able, Inshallah, to uproot this criminal regime. As you declared "we will never kneel save to Allah", declare "we will never kneel to America, and we will never accept its solutions" Declare that the time of intrigues has passed and tell the West: you have no way over us after this day. Declare that the goal of our revolution is full liberation from the disbelieving man-made law of the West and its tyrant agents and that we will not accept other than Islam, as a deen and a rule and a system for life – "Khilafah on the model of prophethood". Declare that the country of Sham, the centre of the abode of Islam, the land of the great battlefield, will be the graveyard for conspiracy and intrigue against it, and of everyone who infringed its rights and the rights of Muslims.
سَيُصِيبُ الَّذِينَ أَجْرَمُوا صَغَارٌ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ وَعَذَابٌ شَدِيدٌ بِمَا كَانُوا يَمْكُرُونَ
"Those who transgressed will face humiliation from Allah, and severe punishment for what they plotted." [Al-An'aam, 6:124]
Hizb ut-Tahrir
Wilayah of Syria
8 Rajab 1433
29/05/2012

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran