Skip to main content

Is Iran Next After Sudan?


By Abu Anas

Several powerful explosions hit the Sudanese capital in Khartoum last Tuesday night at the Yarmouk arms factory, killing two people. Initially, the Sudanese government denied any external air strike on its capital, but later retracted and accused Israel for being behind this attack. Sudanese Information Minister, Ahmed Belal Osman, told Reuters that “an analysis of rocket debris and other material on the ground had shown that Israel was behind the attack.”[1] He said that “four ‘radar-evading’ aircraft were involved in the attack.”[2] Several eyewitness accounts reported that an aircraft or a missile flew over the factory prior to the explosion, including an AFP journalist.[3] The Israeli government declined to comment on this accusation.

Yesterday, Israeli newspaper Haaretz said that Sudanese opposition sources claimed that the arms factory bombed a day earlier “belongs to Iran's Revolutionary Guard.”[4] If the case is that Israel was actually the perpetrator, since it is also the only country that has the capability to launch such an attack in the region, then there are serious implications to this event! Ehud Yaari, a Middle East expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy pointed that "this is [the] longest strike -- the farthest strike -- ever executed by the Israeli air force! We are talking about something that is 1,800 or 1,900 kilometers [from Israel], depending on the route. That's farther away than the range from Israel to the main Iranian nuclear installations in Natanz and Qom."[5]

Israel does not have the capability to fully destroy the Iranian nuclear program, especially facilities that are underground, due to its inability to deliver needed bunker-busting munition. The Obama administration has firmly rejected such an adventure by the Israelis, even though some recent reports have stated that this might be changing.[6] Israel needs to force the US to come along and that is why this time is crucial. The presidential elections are two weeks away and Obama is tied for votes with his contender, and the Israelis know that if they will take on such a gamble, it must be now so they project maximum pressure upon the US administration. Through this strike on Sudan, Israel have proved to the world that it can fly the same distance to Iran and back without any radar system detecting it; a signal, perhaps, to the US that they might still do it on their own!

[1] http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-sudan-planes-idUSBRE89N0WU20121024
[2] http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2012/10/20121024142531802810.html
[3] http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/sudan-accuses-israel-of-bombing-threatens-to-retaliate/story-e6frg6so-1226502769000
[4] http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/sudan-opposition-bombed-arms-factory-belongs-to-iran-s-revolutionary-guard.premium-1.472090 
[5] http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/10/what-are-the-odds-that-israel-just-attacked-sudan/264082/
[6] http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/10/08/wanted_a_truly_credible_military_threat_to_iran

Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran