Skip to main content

Q&A: Women praying in trousers and ruling on her wearing a wig?

Q&A: Is it permitted for a women to pray in trousers and what is the ruling on her wearing a wig?

Question:
As-Salaamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullah Wa Barakaatuhu, Dear Sir,
Is it permissible for a woman to pray in trousers in her home or in a public place? The second question: Is it permissible for a woman to pray and to leave the house with a wig and what is the Hukm (ruling) of this for the woman?
From Moomen Al-Harby

Answer:
Wa Alaikumu Salaam wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakaatuhu,
a. It is not permissible for the woman to leave (her house) and enter into the Hayaat 'Aammah (public life) unless she is in the Shar'i clothing that achieves three aspects:
The covering of the 'Awrah, no Tabbaruj and the Jilbab.
So it is not sufficient to cover the 'Awrah when going out, rather the Jilbaab must be worn over the normal clothing, and she must not be Mutabarrijah where Tabarruj means the adornment (Zeenah) that attracts attention. So the wearing of trousers covers the 'Awrah however it is Tabarruj if a Jilbaab is not over it. And the wig covers the hair however it is considered as Tabarruj because it attracts attention. Therefore it is not permitted to wear the wig in an explicit manner in the public life (Hayaat 'Aammah) even if a Jilbaab was worn unless a Khimar (veil) that covers the wig completely is worn over it and no sign of it is left to be seen. This is because the Zeenah (adornment) even if covered is considered as Tabarruj if it attracts attention. This is like what He سبحانه وتعالى said in relation to the Tahreem (prohibition) of the sound of the anklets that are worn on a woman's leg underneath her dress. When her foot strikes the ground, the sound of the bangles is emitted that indicates their presence. Therefore it is Tabarruj and even if it is covered because the emitting of a sound is what attracts attention:
وَلَا يَضْرِبْنَ بِأَرْجُلِهِنَّ لِيُعْلَمَ مَا يُخْفِينَ مِنْ زِينَتِهِنَّ
"And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment."
(An-Nur: 31)
b. As for the prayer of the woman inside her home then it is stipulated that her 'Awrah is to be covered and it is not a condition for her to wear the Jilbab.
As for her going out to the Masjid or the open space of the 'Eid prayer, then indeed it is obligatory for her to wear clothing that achieves three aspects:
Clothing that covers the 'Awrah, clothing that contains no Tabarruj and the Jilbab.
Therefore her prayer outside her home needs to meet the three aforementioned requirements. As such it is not permissible for her to pray outside her home in a place like the Masjid for example, if she is wearing trousers or a wig because trousers and the wig fall under the category of Tabarruj i.e. the Zeenah (adornment) which attracts attention even if it covers that which is underneath them. Therefore her prayer in them is not Saheeh (valid) and she is sinful for simply leaving her home and entering the public life without the Shar'i dress which includes the three previously mentioned aspects.
Your Brother,
Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah
18 Rajab 1434 AH
28 May 2013 CE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran