Skip to main content

America is Dismantling Iraq, and Marching Behind is the Spectra of the Kaffir Colonialists. They Forget their Disputes as Long as the Matter is Dividing Muslim Land

Events in Iraq have been accelerating in a shocking, apparent manner since 10/06/2014 when the revolutionaries entered Mosul until now, followed by the collapse of the Iraqi army in Mosul and Tikrit, somewhat like delivery and receipt, but by the orders from top leaders in the army. Then Maliki's call to mobilize militias rather than the military, attack and retreat in Diyala, and even close to Baghdad. Even Baiji, the largest oil refinery is disputed by missiles, launchers and aircrafts ... and then away to Tal Afar, and so forth, all in a record time, as if it were set up on a date... These events have been accompanied by confessional and sectarian calls from references and leaders until the sedition reached its peak, and became visible with its head and face, weeping and made others weep, on the land of Mesopotamia, which was once the capital of the world whose Khaleefah used to address the clouds!
Although these events are grave, the international reactions were not at the level of the events, thus politicians' statements were calculated, and were not of the magnitude of the event. So some placed blame on the crisis in Syria, others placed blamed on preventing the rights of Sunnis in Iraq, and others on the tyranny of al-Maliki ... and all were previously found and not born today! And so the events did not manifest internationally to the size that matches them except that there was coordination or prior knowledge of the influential perpetrators in the political scene. The most prominent of these statements came from Obama's quotes where he announced on Friday, 13th June 2014 assuring the world of the flow of oil and its compensation from the stock of the Gulf States if oil supplies get disrupted in Iraq which indicates that US administration was not surprised by what is happening on the ground, but also had prepared plans in advance to avoid any oil crisis. Then, there is also what Obama stated on 13/06/2014 that Washington "will not participate in military action in the absence of a political plan offered by the Iraqis," This is despite the security agreement between America and Iraq, and despite that the Iraqi Foreign Minister Zebari said in Jeddah on 18/06/2014, Wednesday evening "that Baghdad had asked Washington to conduct air strikes against militants". This was confirmed by the head of US Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dempsey in front of members of Congress, which means that America is not in a hurry to intervene, but it delays it to accomplish other arrangements. As for Britain, although its interests in Iraq are different from those of America, but it followed the same US approach because the matter is regarding the tearing of a Muslim country. The British Foreign Secretary William Hague told BBC on 16/06/2014, when he was asked about the non-intervention in Iraq saying: "The United States is much more likely to have assets and capabilities for any outside intervention than the United Kingdom."
Whoever reflects on the current events sees them as an episode in a series of episodes that were not only initiated by America with its occupation of Iraq, but also before the occupation, since America imposed no-fly zones in North of Iraq in 1991, where Kurdistan became a quasi-state region! And when America occupied Iraq in 2003, the American governor of Iraq, Bremer set a constitution carrying the seed of dismantling Iraq that made him utter with confessional and sectarian-based quota system. The seed continued to grow until the month of 12/2011, when America exited Iraq with its military appearance but remained in it with its security and political reality, wherein the tree of sedition blossomed. Then America fueled it placing an intolerant sectarian tyrant at the head of the government in Iraq. So Maliki deliberately crushed the areas of Northern and Western Iraq, and tyrannized and oppressed in unprecedented brutality, whenever it receded, he ignited again with provocative acts and sayings to aggravate those areas ... And the sectarian incitement escalated with the creation of the Shiite armed militias, and in return focusing on ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Levant) as being Sunni terrorism, although the movements that have entered Mosul and Tikrit and the others were from several movements, including ISIS... And the matter did not stop at this point, but the neighboring countries raced in highlighting sectarianism... all in the implementation of US policy, and marching behind it Britain, then the agents and the followers who do not want Iraq to be a unified entity, but want it to be a fragmented feuding divergent entity, killing each other! And each party clings stubbornly to have a territory, and the calls for provinces and divisions became publicly proclaimed... And because events occur without concealment, the Kurdistan region realized the reality of the situation, and therefore at a time the rebels controlled Mosul, the Peshmerga forces of the Kurdistan region came to fully control Kirkuk and the surrounding areas. Reuters quoted on 15/06/2014 Fuad Hussein, Barzani's chief of staff, as saying: "Iraq has entered a new phase that is completely different than before control of Mosul and that the Kurds will discuss how to deal with this new Iraq."
O Muslims... O Arabs... O Kurds... O Sunnis... O Shiites... O People of Mesopotamia...
Your blood has been shed, your wealth looted and your homes, rather your Mosques destroyed, and Iraq has become a failed fragile state that does not block a meddling hand... Is there not among you a man of reason to reflect on what happened? Do not you see that America and their alliances, agents and followers ... all exasperate the sedition (fitnah), so it boils then trickles down into three branches, three rips, three territories: Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites, that are not gathered by any relation except by a thin thread or much less...! Is not it so? Do you not wonder how America has protected the Kurdistan region? And how Bremer implanted in its constitution the seeds of the 'madh'habism' (school of thought) and sectarian-based system? Do not you wonder how America created in the current government a tyrant in power who infuses the sectarian strife without modesty or shame? Do not you wonder how America is watching the situation and feeding it for the Kurds to diverge from the Arabs, and the Sunnis to diverge from the Shiites? Do not you wonder how America meets with Britain, the agents and the followers, and everyone is marching in the direction of feeding into this sedition (fitneh), this with the knowledge that the interests of America and Britain are different, but they meet on tearing Muslim lands?!
Islam has unified you for centuries, and its Banner has shaded you for a long period of time, so you were strong and dignified. You shared the Good together, and you fought the Evil together... Your country is the land of tournaments; the land of al-Qadisiyah, the land of al-Buwaib the Persian Yarmouk, the country of Haroon al-Rashid and al-Mu'tassim, the country of Salah al-Din, the country of the conquerors, the former and the subsequent Allah willing. The undivided Iraq is strong by its people, and the torn Iraq is weak by its rips... If the Kurds assume that the presence of a Kurdistan region or a state of Kurdistan will bring them dignity, it would not exceed a short period, but will lead to their death after a while... And if the Sunnis assume that the existence of a territory that belongs to them in the Northern and Western Iraq will bring them a decent living, it would not exceed a worthwhile period, and then misery and hardship will inflict afterwards... If the Shiites assume that the presence of the territory that belongs to them in the South will bring them the power of tyranny it would only be for a short time, and then matters shall return to weakness and humiliation.
O Muslims... O Arabs... O Kurds... O Sunnis... O Shiites... O People of Mesopotamia...
The guide does not lie to his people, and Hizb ut Tahrir is a sincere advisor to you, so do not incline towards America and Europe, they will not give you any weight, but they are serious in inflicting you with fatal wounds ... so that they create three entities in Iraq that are connected together by a worn-out bond in a nominal state as a prelude to cut this bond in the later stages... We are able to understand the direction of the poisoned arrows of America and the West at us ... But for the people of Iraq to accept that, and even struggling to achieve it, and all of them seeking the help of America in that, then this is a widespread evil.
وَلَا تَرْكَنُوا إِلَى الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا فَتَمَسَّكُمُ النَّارُ وَمَا لَكُمْ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ مِنْ أَوْلِيَاءَ ثُمَّ لَا تُنْصَرُونَ
"And do not incline toward those who do wrong, lest you be touched by the Fire, and you would not have other than Allah any protectors; then you would not be helped."
(Hud: 133)
You are one Ummah that is prohibited from being fragmented.
وَاعْتَصِمُوا بِحَبْلِ اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا وَلَا تَفَرَّقُوا
"And hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together and do not become divided."
(Al-i-Imran: 103)
And you are prohibited to dispute, otherwise your strength would collapse and your enemy will become greedy with you.
وَلَا تَنَازَعُوا فَتَفْشَلُوا وَتَذْهَبَ رِيحُكُمْ
"and do not dispute and [thus] lose courage and [then] your strength would depart"
(Al-Anfal: 46)
O people of Mesopotamia this matter will not be reformed except with a remedy from the start: ruling by what Allah has revealed, and jihad in the name of Allah ... holding fast to the rope of Allah and breaking the bond with the enemies of Allah... and the rejection of sectarianism and madh'habism «دَعُوهَا فَإِنَّهَا مُنْتِنَةٌ» "Leave it, its rotten",Bukhari narrated from Jabir... Quit the titles of sectarianism and madh'habism, and hold on to the name that Allah named us
هُوَ سَمَّاكُمُ الْمُسْلِمِينَ
"Allah named you 'Muslims'"
(Al-Hajj: 78)
So return to Him and establish His state, the rightly guided Khilafah, by it you will be glorified, and by it you will address the clouds once again, and by it you will return servants of Allah as one brotherhood...
إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَذِكْرَى لِمَنْ كَانَ لَهُ قَلْبٌ أَوْ أَلْقَى السَّمْعَ وَهُوَ شَهِيدٌ
"Indeed in that is a reminder for whoever has a heart or who listens while he is present [in mind]."
(Qaf: 37)
Hizb ut Tahrir
21st Sha'ban 1435 AH
19/06/2014 CE
The above is a draft translation from Arabic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran