Skip to main content

Secrets of the US-Syrian Relations

After the defeat of the Ottoman Caliphate in World War I, and through the Sykes-Picot agree­ment between France and Britain in 1916, the French occu­pied what we know today as  Syria. For one to under­stand the extent of US influ­ence in Syria and to map the rela­tion­ship between the Assad regime and the US, one must con­sider the his­tory of mod­ern Syria. The fol­low­ing are 10 key points, in chrono­log­i­cal order, start­ing from the time of West­ern col­o­niza­tion of Syria to the present day, high­light­ing US involve­ment in the country.
  1. US and CIA orches­trated mil­i­tary coups in Syria since 1949: The US, through its embassy in Dam­as­cus and the CIA, led the first ever mil­i­tary coup in Syria in 1949, as detailed in the book “The Game of Nations” by Miles Copeland. This marked the begin­ning of the inter­na­tional strug­gle over the Mid­dle East between the United States, the new entrant to the world arena, and the Euro­peans (French and British) who held the influ­ence in the region but came out of World War II dev­as­tated. The USembassy and the CIA con­tin­ued to sup­port sev­eral sub­se­quent mil­i­tary coups in Syria through­out the 50s and 60s against their Euro­pean rivals, this was an era of insta­bil­ity that lasted over two decades.

  2. Hafez’s pull­out out of the 1967 war to secure Israel: Ex-President, Amin al-Hafiz, said in an inter­view on Al-Jazeera on July 2nd, 2001 that Hafez al-Assad, the then Defense Min­is­ter, sent a strict order of with­drawal to the Syr­ian army from the Golan Heights at the begin­ning of the war. This was before any sign of defeat or real con­fronta­tion against the Israeli mil­i­tary which has resulted in the occu­pa­tion of such a strate­gic location.[1] It was through this move, Assad gained the trust of the US in defend­ing Israel’s north­ern bor­der, which he con­tin­ued to do for the next three decades.

  3. US sup­port­ing Syria through UN Res­o­lu­tion 242 in 1967: UN Res­o­lu­tion 242 which was passed after the 1967 War, com­monly known as the six-day war, with Israel and its occu­pa­tion of the Golan Heights, grants Syria, to this day, the right to regain back its territory.[2] The US sup­ported this agree­ment and Syria’s right to its ter­ri­tory. This is in stark con­trast to the Israeli posi­tion, apart from occa­sional lip ser­vice, of reject­ing any notion of sur­ren­der­ing this geo­graph­i­cally strate­gic territory. 

  4. Strength­ened US-Syrian rela­tions after the 1973 war: After the 1973 sur­prise war with Israel, the US should have slammed Syria with sanc­tions. On the con­trary, in 1974, Pres­i­dent Nixon per­son­ally paid a visit to Dam­as­cus to strengthen rela­tions with the Assad regime.

  5. US accep­tance of Syr­ian occu­pa­tion of Lebanon since 1976: Syr­ian troops invaded Lebanon at the begin­ning of the civil war. The silence on part of the US against such an occu­pa­tion was a “green light” to Hafez al-Assad to ini­ti­ate and con­tinue this inva­sion until 2005, when a French-mandated res­o­lu­tion pushed the Syr­i­ans out with Amer­i­can reluc­tance. One polit­i­cal ana­lyst described this US role by say­ing: “[The US] seemed tac­itly to acqui­esce to con­tin­ued Syr­ian ascen­dancy in Lebanon.“[3]

  6. Coop­er­a­tion of Syria and US through the Tai’f Agree­ment in 1989: The Ta’if agree­ment was signed in Saudi Ara­bia between the dif­fer­ent Lebanese fac­tions to put an end to the civil war in 89’. TheUS was the power bro­ker besides France, Saudi Ara­bia, Egypt and Syria that helped form the agree­ment, “prompt­ing inter­na­tional sup­port for Syrian―guardianship over Lebanon.“[4]

  7. Syria join­ing the US in its cam­paign to invade Iraq in 1991: Syria sup­ported the US in its war cam­paign against Iraq (Oper­a­tion Desert Storm) and sent 14,500 sol­diers and per­son­nel to aid the US in its inva­sion of Iraq.[5]

  8. US medi­at­ing nego­ti­a­tion between Syria and Israel dur­ing 1990’s: Hafez al-Assad accepted theUS to be a medi­a­tor between Syria and Israel. Army Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Hik­mat al-Shihabi, led the del­e­ga­tion to the US that dis­cussed peace nego­ti­a­tions on the mat­ter. In an inter­view with Rus­sia TodayTV, Syr­ian ex-Minister of Defense and a pil­lar of the Assad regime, Mustafa Tlass, stated unequiv­o­cally that al-Shihabi was a CIA-agent for the US.[6]

  9. Intel­li­gence coop­er­a­tion between CIA and Syria to tor­ture detainees since 2001: The close coop­er­a­tion between the CIA and the Syr­ian regime was so warm, that even dur­ing times when Syria was called a rogue state, the Syr­ian regime offered its ser­vices to do the dirty work of the CIA. The regime used its world renowned intel­li­gence agen­cies to extract infor­ma­tion from detainees and pris­on­ers of war through tor­ture for the CIA. The famous case of Cana­dian cit­i­zen Maher Arar is one exam­ple that made Inter­na­tional news.[7]

  10. US sup­port of regime dur­ing the Syr­ian Rev­o­lu­tion of 2011: As has been dis­cussed in detail through our first part of this series on the agency of the Assad regime, the US has stood silent and watched the daily slaugh­ter of Syr­ian civil­ians for 2 years, in addi­tion to deny­ing the rebels the weapons needed to pro­tect them­selves and to oust Assad.
As can clearly be seen, the US tried early on in Syria’s mod­ern his­tory to set its agents in power through mil­i­tary coups. Although the US con­tin­ued its pub­lic rhetoric against Syria, it achieved com­plete hege­mony when its agent, Hafez al-Assad, gained power in 1970. Since al-Assad, Syria has been a covert proxy state for the US serv­ing its inter­ests in the region and pro­tect­ing Israel’s north­ern bor­ders, while out­wardly claim­ing to be the resis­tance leader within the Arab region.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran