Skip to main content

The difference between Usool ul-Fiqh and Fiqh


1) Usool ul-Fiqh, as we have mentioned, represents the principles (Qawa’id) that the Mujtahid follows in the Istinbat (extraction) of the practical Shari’ah rulings from their detailed evidences like the Qaa’idah (principle):

‘Working with two evidences is better (more proper) than neglecting one of them’.

This is whilst Fiqh is the ‘Ilm (knowledge) of the practical Ahkam Shari’ah taken from its detailed evidences like: Khamr is Haraam, Al-Jihaad is Fard. Tahaarah is a Shart (condition) from the conditions of the validity of the Salaah and like Haid (menses) is A Maani’ (prevention) for the performance of the Salaah.

2) Usool ul-Fiqh includes studies in relation to the language and its principles because these principles are necessary for Ijtihad. This is like: The studies about the Haqeeqah (literal) and Majaaz (metaphorical), the meanings of the Huroof Al-Jarr (prepositions), the Huroof Ash-Shart, and the general Alfaazh (expressions) amongst other matters.

This is whilst Fiqh is restricted to the explanation of the Hukm Shar’i that is a requirement of the Mukallaf like: The Salaah is Fard, ‘Umrah is Sunnah (Mandoob) and Riba is Haraam.

3) Usool ul-Fiqh examines the Ijmaaliy Shar’i Daleel like the Qur’an, Sunnah, Qiyas and Ijmaa’ in respect to establishing that it has come from Allah and then it examines what came within it in terms of principles and forms like: The Khusoos and the ‘Umoom (specific and general), the Mutlaq and the Muqayyad (unrestricted and restricted), Al-Mujmal (general/un-detailed) and Al-Bayaan (explanation) and An-Naskh (abrogation).

This is whilst Fiqh examines the Daleel Al-Juz’iy (partial evidence) that guides to or indicates a specific Hukm for a matter or an action for the purpose of the Mukallaf abiding by it. So for example it will examine the Ayah:

وَقَاتِلُوا الْمُشْرِكِينَ كَافَّةً كَمَا يُقَاتِلُونَكُمْ كَافَّةً
“And fight against the disbelievers collectively as they fight against you collectively”
  [TMQ At-Taubah 36]

And the Ayah:

وَأَحَلَّ اللَّـهُ الْبَيْعَ وَحَرَّمَ الرِّبَا
And Allah has made trade Halaal and made Riba (usury) Haraam”  [TMQ Al-Baqarah 275]

And the Hadith:

‘If two Khalifahs are given the Bai’ah then kill the latter of the two’  [Muslim]

And the Ijmaa As-Sahabah (ra) in respect to delaying the burial of the Messenger of Allah (saw) until after they had pledged allegiance to a Khalifah from amongst them.

That is done in order for the Hukm As-Shar’i to be taken from each Daleel (evidence).

4) The aim of Usool ul-Fiqh is the application of its principles upon the detailed evidences to arrive to the manner of how the practical Ahkam Shari’ah are extracted.

This is whilst the aim of Fiqh is to explain and apply the Ahkam Shari’ah upon the actions of the people and their speech and it is to make every Mukallaf aware of the commands of Allah (swt) and what He has forbidden, so that the Mukallaf can adhere to it in his actions. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran