Skip to main content

Q&A: Difference between Privatization, Nationalization and Iqta‘ (Allocation of Land)

Answer to Question
Difference between Privatization, Nationalization and Iqta‘ (Allocation of Land)
To: Hamzeh Shihadeh

Question
Asalamu Alaikum WA Rahmatulah Wa Barakatuhu
What is the difference between privatization in the capitalist system and Iqta’ (allocation of land) that is mentioned in the book, Funds in the Khilafah State?
Answer
Wa Alaikum As-Salam Wa Rahmatulah Wa Barakatuhu,
1- There are three types of ownership: public property, state property and private property - whatever that is not included in the public and state ownership.
2- Public property are the items that the legislator made their ownership belong to all Muslims, a joint ownership between them, and prevented individuals from their ownership, such as electricity generators, power plants, gas factories, coal, and minerals that are in abundance, that are not limited, whether solid such as gold and iron, or a liquid such as oil, or gas such as natural gas, all of these and similar ones are public property owned by all Muslims, shared ownership, and it is a source of funds of Bait ul Mal of Muslims, distributed by the Khalifah to them, in accordance with the Shariah rules.
3- State ownership is any piece of land or building connected to a right of all the Muslims; it is separate to public property. State ownership can be of land, buildings, transferrable objects, that are linked to a right of the general Muslims according to Shariah rules, the Khalifah has the authority to manage, monitor, and make decision regarding the property.
4- Although the state manages the public property, and manages the state property, yet there is a difference between the two ownerships. All that comes under the public property, such as oil, gas, and abundant minerals, seas, rivers, springs, squares, bushes, grasslands, and mosques, it is not permissible for the Khalifah to give its ownership to any one, whether an individual or group; because it belongs to all the Muslims collectively.
As for what constitutes state ownership of the land, and buildings, then the Khalifah can give their owner to individuals, and the title (ownership) and benefit, or benefit without ownership (of the neck), or to allow them to be revived and owned, and he can dispose of it in the manner that he sees for the interest of the Muslims
5- The Khalifah has permission to give from the state ownership of land for the one who does not have agricultural land, the person can cultivate it and it becomes his property, so that wealth does not remain confined only in the hands of the rich but it should be circulated:
(كَيْ لَا يَكُونَ دُولَةً بَيْنَ الْأَغْنِيَاءِ مِنْكُمْ)
“so that it will not be a perpetual distribution among the rich from among you” [Al-Hashr: 7]
However, the Khalifah has no permission to take away from someone’s private property wrongfully and then gives it to another, but he can give from the state ownership for the poor and not the rich; which is called the allocation of land.
Iqta’ (allocation of land) is taken from the state’s land and not from private property and of course not from the public property.
6- These properties are stipulated by the Shariah rules, it is not permissible to change its classification, so the public ownership is not changed to private ownership, like giving the right for oil exploration and extraction to a private company, the so-called "privatization", this is turning public property to private ownership. Likewise it is not permissible to transfer private property to state property, like taking away by force the shop of a person and is made the ownership of the state which is called nationalization.
7- It is clear from above to see the difference between privatization, nationalization and Iqta’ (allocation of land). Privatization is the sale of public property to private companies, such as giving the privilege of oil exploration or mining or electricity to private companies, which is forbidden. This is because public ownership remains public property and does not become private property ... Nationalization is to change the individual private property to the ownership of the state or to public property, like turning a shop from individual ownership to public ownership or state ownership, and this is not permissible because the properties remain a possession of their respective owners, and this right is not alter to other than the owner.
As for Iqta’, it is when the state gives from its ownership to individuals, raising their economic standing, and does not leave the wealth confined and circulating among the rich, and many people do not possess what they can live by in dignity and pride, thus the state gives land to some of those who have no land to cultivate, and it gives from its funds also to farmers and help them to cultivate their land.
Thus Iqta’ in Islam in the Fiqh understanding is different from nationalization and different from privatization.
Your brother,
Ata Bin Khalil Abu Al-Rashtah
01/01/2017 CE
03 Rabii’ II 1438 AH
The link to the answer from the Ameer’s Facebook page
The link to the answer from the Ameer’s page on Google Plus
The link to the answer from the Ameer’s page on Twitter


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An advice to Muslims working in the financial sector

Assalam wa alaikum wa rahmatullah wabarakatahu, Dear Brothers & Sisters, We are saddened to see Muslims today even those who practise many of the rules of Islam are working in jobs which involve haram in the financial sector. They are working in positions which involve usurious (Riba) transactions, insurance, the stock market and the like. Even though many of the clear evidences regarding the severity of the sin of Riba are known, some have justified their job to themselves thinking that they are safe as long as they are not engaged in the actual action of taking or giving Riba. Brothers & Sisters, You should know that the majority of jobs in the financial sector, even the IT jobs in this area are haram (prohibited) as they involve the processing of prohibited contracts. If you work in this sector, do not justify your job to yourself because of the fear of losing your position or having to change your career, fear Allah as he should be feared and consider His law regard

Q&A: Age of separating children in the beds?

Question: Please explain the hukm regarding separation of children in their beds. At what age is separation an obligation upon the parents? Also can a parent sleep in the same bed as their child? Answer: 1- With regards to separating children in their beds, it is clear that the separation which is obligatory is when they reach the age of 7 and not since their birth. This is due to the hadith reported by Daarqutni and al-Hakim from the Messenger (saw) who said: When your children reach the age of 7 then separate their beds and when they reach 10 beat them if they do not pray their salah.’ This is also due to what has been narrated by al-Bazzar on the authority of Abi Rafi’ with the following wording: ‘We found in a sheet near the Messenger of Allah (saw) when he died on which the following was written: Separate the beds of the slave boys and girls and brothers and sisters of 7 years of age.’ The two hadiths are texts on the separation of children when they reach the age of 7. As for the

Q&A: Shari' rule on songs, music, singing & instruments?

The following is a draft translation from the book مسائل فقهية مختارة (Selected fiqhi [jurprudential] issues) by the Mujtahid, Sheikh Abu Iyas Mahmoud Abdul Latif al-Uweida (May Allah protect him) . Please refer to the original Arabic for exact meanings. Question: What is the Shari’ ruling in singing or listening to songs?  What is the hukm of using musical instruments and is its trade allowed? I request you to answer in detail with the evidences? Answer: The Imams ( Mujtahids ) and the jurists have differed on the issue of singing and they have varying opinions such as haraam (prohibited), Makruh (disliked) and Mubah (permissible), the ones who have prohibited it are from the ones who hold the opinion of prohibition of singing as a trade or profession, and a similar opinion has been transmitted from Imam Shafi’i, and from the ones who disliked it is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal who disliked the issue and categorised its performance under disliked acts, a similar opinion has been tran